How Should Our Society Assign Value To Human Life?

[name][professor][date of submission][course]The Value of LifeSince epoch immemorial , there were m some(prenominal) attempts to take in the survey of intent . During early generation , people were cosmea sold as wives , slaves and other functions . in that respect was tied(p) a period wherein people had embraced the idea that there is no protect to animation at all , particularly during the time of the prevalence of existentialism . In the context of today s world , rough argues that sp advancedliness is now tending(p) valuate by achievements deposition , or the amount of salary one receives . But be these things qualified to be our measure of the value of life ? Or perhaps the more profound inquiry would be : is it yet possible to assign value to human lifeOn her article on TIME , entitled What is a Life Wor th , Amanda Ripley had argued that the innovative society s attempt to assign a value to life is based on property . The author had presented instances wherein somebody dies turn on the job , yet the family does non receive some(prenominal) compensation . It was akin the family was expecting that someone pay financially for someone s death . Although , policy and compensation is a popular demeanor of placing financial value to someone s life , it still does non sound right . Money cannot simply be sufficiency to compensate for someone s life , simply because of the fact that we did not use money to acquire life . Moreover , any amount would not be enough to bring rump someone who is already dead . Yet this is the expression companies , the governance , and the families left base approach death of a soulfulness (RipleyInterestingly , William Shakespeargon , arguably the virtually influential writer of all time , presents a radical for determining the value of life . by means of the monologue of the regard! ed best dramatic character of all time , searing point , Shakespeargon laid down his argument . critical point s soliloquy suggests to us that life is intrinsically full of misfortunes .

The character of Hamlet is contemplating suicide , as he views this as the only stylus to free himself of life s misfortunes (Hamlet ,Prince of Denmark ,Act III ,Sc .1It searchs like both Ripley and Shakespeare are arguing that life can only be inclined value through death . Moreover , their arguments are concentrate on the misfortunes of an individual . We know that life is full of misfortunes , and there are still just as more irr esponsible points to being aliveBoth pieces are also suggesting that the social status of a person has much to do with the value life . Ripley had explored the distrust : is there a difference between a execrable man and a rich man in hurt of the value of life . Shakespeare is also seemingly suggesting the uniform promontory as his protagonist , Hamlet , is belonging to a spirited social status - not to mention he is the prince of Denmark . in time saddening to think , both authors maybe irrefutably right . There seem to be a significant difference in the value of life between the average person and the favor ones...If you penury to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper